Volume 8, Issue 6, November 2019, Page: 239-243
Improving Students’ Learning Results Through the SQ4R Learning Model Approach
Iswan, Faculty of Education, Muhammadiyah University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Herwina, Faculty of Education, Muhammadiyah University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Teguh Ridka Fitrianto, Teacher Elemtery Laboratorium School FIP-UMJ, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
Received: Jul. 31, 2019;       Accepted: Aug. 26, 2019;       Published: Sep. 16, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.edu.20190806.11      View  87      Downloads  73
Abstract
The results of observations and evaluations of students in 6th grade of Semester I, mathematics learning in 2017/2018 learning year most of the scores are still below the Minimum Completion Criticism of mathematics learning by 70. This is evidenced by the data of 17 students, 8 students or (47.06%) scored above the Minimum Completion Criticism, while 9 students or (52.94%) scored below the Minimum Completion Criticism. Based on this statement, the researcher set a solution to improve mathematics learning outcomes by using the approach of the learning model Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Reflect, and Review (SQ4R). The SQ4R model is a learning model that provides curiosity and can encourage processing in depth and breadth. The formulation of the research problem is how can student learning outcomes on mathematics subjects be improved through the use of learning models (SQ4R)? How do you implement the Survey learning model (SQ4R) can improve mathematics learning outcomes for 6th grade, students of primary school in SD Lab. School FIP-UMJ? The study was conducted in 2 cycles. Each cycle consists of 4 stages. They are planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 17 students. Data collection techniques was used test material techniques. Minimum Completion Criticism score, classical learning completeness is at least 85%, and individual completeness is at least 70. Percentage of completeness in cycle I is 82.35%, and cycle II 88.24%, implementation of SQ4R model can improve Mathematics learning outcomes.
Keywords
Improving Student Learning Results, Through the SQ4R, Learning Model Approach
To cite this article
Iswan, Herwina, Teguh Ridka Fitrianto, Improving Students’ Learning Results Through the SQ4R Learning Model Approach, Education Journal. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 239-243. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20190806.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Esah, Siti. Sugiyono, Suryani. “Application of the in thematic approach improve learning activities students in 1st grade of SD 3 Siantan, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia”, August, 18, 2019. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/download/4847/4924.
[2]
Okoro, C. O. and Okoro, C. U. “Teachers’ Understanding And Use Of Thematic Approach In Teaching And Learning Of Social Studies In Rivers State’, International Journal of Education, Learning and Development Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 64-69, April 2016. August, 18, 2019. http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Teachers----Understanding-and-Use-of-Thematic-Approach-in-Teaching-and-Learning-of-Social-Studies-in-Rivers-State1.pdf.
[3]
OECD. 2018. PISA 2015 Results in Focus. August, 24, 2019. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.
[4]
Mullis, Ina V. S. et. al. 2012, “PIRLS 2011: International Results in Reading. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Boston, USA. August, 25, 2019. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/downloads/P11_IR_FullBook.pdf.
[5]
Mullis, Ina V. S. et. al. 2017. “PIRL 2016: Internastional Results in Reading”. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA): Boston, USA. August, 25, 2019. http://pirls2016.org/wp-content/uploads/structure/CompletePDF/P16-PIRLS-International-Results-in-Reading.pdf.
[6]
Başar, Murat and Mehmet Gürbüz. 2017. “Effect of the SQ4R Technique on the Reading Comprehension of Elementary School 4th Grade Elementary School Students”, International Journal of Instruction, April 2017, Vol. 10, No. 2. August 25, 2019. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1138366.pdf.
[7]
Khusniyah, Nurul Lailatul; Rasyid, Yumna; Lustyantie, Ninuk. 2017. “Improving English Reading Comprehension Ability through Survey, Questions, Read, Record, Recite, Review Strategy (SQ4R)”. English Language Teaching; Vol. 10, No. 12; 2017. August, 25, 2019. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/71907.
[8]
Arikunto, Suharsimi 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[9]
Aqib, Zainal. (2010). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: Yrama Widya. Indonesia.
[10]
Aris, Shoimin. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurukulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media. Indonesia.
Browse journals by subject