Volume 8, Issue 6, November 2019, Page: 286-295
The Game Between National Propositions and Provincial Propositions from the Perspective of Fairness
Xie Dongping, Institute of Educational Sciences, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Department of Teacher Education, Honghe University, Mengzi, China
Received: Nov. 25, 2018;       Accepted: Jan. 2, 2019;       Published: Nov. 13, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.edu.20190806.18      View  46      Downloads  19
Abstract
The college entrance examination proposition management system is facing a new round of reorganization and adjustment. The switch between national proposition and provincial proposition reflects the game between national interests and local interests, and becomes a beneficial attempt and exploration to resolve the risk of college entrance examination. However, before the differences in enrollment quota allocation patterns have not been eliminated, the point of equality between national propositions and provincial propositions is not in the propositional system itself. The proposition of the college entrance examination directly affects the allocation, development and cultivation of basic education resources and further influences the development potential of regional basic education and ultimately the fairness of basic education. Therefore, the fairness of basic education is a subject that can not be circumvented by national propositions and provincial propositions. Under the current trend of returning to the national proposition, to achieve a quality education equity , it is committed to give more freedom for university entrance Exam and strengthen the professionalization of local examination institutions and enhance the level and ability of local examination institutes, At the same time, the government should consider the reality of local basic education and improve the level of local basic education.
Keywords
Fairness, National Proposition, Provincial Proposition, Basic Education
To cite this article
Xie Dongping, The Game Between National Propositions and Provincial Propositions from the Perspective of Fairness, Education Journal. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 286-295. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20190806.18
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Huang Guang Yang. Several issues of primary concern in the reform of college entrance examination: [J]. Curriculum, Textbook, Teaching method, 2011(6): 9.
[2]
Liu Haifeng. Retrospect and Prospect of college entrance examination reform [J]. Education Research, 2007 (11): 19.
[3]
Huang Xiaomei. Rational Examination of the Reform of College Enrollment Examination System: Evaluation of the Series of Research on College Entrance Examination Reform [J]. University Publication, 2008 (5): 70.
[4]
Liu Haifeng. Fairness in college entrance examination or efficiency priority [J]. Higher Education Research, 2011 (5): 4.
[5]
Wang Houxiong. Practical Dilemma and dilemma in the fairness of college entrance examination proposition [J]. education research, 2008 (8): 24.
[6]
Yang Xue Wei. History of Chinese examinations [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003: 3.
[7]
Liu Wanyong. The Ministry of Education will make every effort to guarantee the implementation of the provincial proposition of the National College Entrance Examination [EB/OL]. China Education and Scientific Research Computer Network. Basic Education. Basic Education News. (2004-03-25) [2017-10-01]. http://www.edu.cn/ji_jiao_news_279/20060323/t20060323_90968.shtml.
[8]
Liu Haifeng, Gu Zhenyu. Small Incident Initiated Great Reform: Origin and Trend of Provincial Proposition in College Entrance Examination [J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 2012 (5): 17.
[9]
State Council. State Council's Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Examination Enrollment System [EB/OL]. Chinese Government Network. Government Information Opening. (2014-09-04) [2017-10-01]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-09/04/content_9065.htm.
[10]
Li Muzhou. From "Alternation" to "Hybridity": Historical Choice of the Way of Proposition and Score in College Entrance Examination [J]. Examination Research, 2011 (5): 23-24.
[11]
Liao Pingsheng. Examination is a science [M]. Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University press, 2003: 109.
[12]
Zhang Sheng. Ethical Examination and Empirical Research on Equity in College Entrance Examination [D]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Changsha: School of Public Administration, Central South University, 2013: 64.
[13]
Zhou Bin. On the lack of educational function of the college entrance examination system and promotion of [J]. Education Theory and Practice, 2009 (1): 17.
[14]
Zheng Ruoling. Anxiety and exploration of fairness in college entrance examination [J]. Peking University education review, 2010 (2): 26.
[15]
Chen Tan, Hu Xiao Rawls Principle and Institutional Logic of Higher Education Equity [J]. Modern University Education, 2008 (4): 4.
[16]
Hu Maoliang, a provincial proposition, is one of the most important leaders in the [N]. China Education Daily, 2005-11-09 (009).
[17]
Anonymous, Editor. Reviewing the Provincial Proposition of College Entrance Examination Reform: Provincial Proposition, Achieving Leap-forward Development in College Entrance Examination Reform (Part I) [N]. China Education Daily, 2006-09-27 (006).
[18]
Wang Yunfang proposed to restore the national college entrance examination unified proposition [N]. China Education Daily, 2013-06-17 (007).
[19]
Easton, D. Political System - A Study of Political Science [M]. Ma Qinghuai, Translated. Beijing: Business Press, 1993: 123.
[20]
Rawls, J. theory of justice [M]. He Huaihong, et al. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 1988: 101.
[21]
Li Lifeng. Multidimensional examination and Reflection on the reform of the independent proposition of the college entrance examination. [J]. examination research, 2011 (2): 9.
[22]
Anonymous, Editor. Reviewing the Provincial Proposition of College Entrance Examination Reform: Provincial Proposition, Achieving Leap-forward Development in College Entrance Examination Reform (Part II) [N]. China Education Daily, 2006-09-27 (006).
[23]
Zhou Ji, Minister of Education: Provincial proposition of college entrance examination has advantages and disadvantages [EB/OL]. Official website of China Youth Daily. Zhongqing Online.
[24]
Chen Peng. The college entrance examination topic is back to the era of "national volume" [N]. Guangming Daily, 2015-04-03 (006).
[25]
Yu Yang. Research on the advantages of national unity in the national college entrance examination [J]. Hubei entrance examination, 2015 (6): 25.
[26]
Duan Liufang. Zhang Zhiyong: The profound impact of the new round of college entrance examination reform on basic education [EB/OL]. China Networks. Education China. Industry dynamics. (2015-11-10)[2017-10-01]. http://edu.china.com.cn/2015-11/10/content_37027814.htm.
[27]
Ministry of education. Interim Measures for the assignment of the national unified examination for colleges and Universities: [EB/OL]. Ministry of education official website. Information disclosure.(2006-04-19)[2017-10-01]. http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_1304/200701/18439.html.
[28]
Wang Houxiong. Practical Dilemma and dilemma of fairness in college entrance examination proposition [J]. education research, 2008 (8): 25-26.
[29]
Jing Tian Kui. As a just development of [J]. social science front, 2003 (6): 216.
[30]
Jiang Chang. On the connotation and essence of the justice of education examination [J]. Hubei entrance examination, 2007 (10): 6.
[31]
Office of National Working Group on Medium and Long Term Education Reform and Development Program. National Medium and Long Term Education Reform and Development Program (2010-2020) [EB/OL]. Official website of Ministry of Education. Information disclosure. (2010-07-29)[2017-10-01]. http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html.
[32]
Cheng Hongyan. Debate on the relationship between educational equity and educational quality [J]. Nanjing Social Sciences, 2014 (11): 116.
[33]
Tan Song Hua, Wang Jian. Pursue quality education equality [J]. People's Education, 2011 (18): 2-3.
[34]
Wu Gangping. Equality of Opportunity and Quality in Compulsory Education in China [J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), 2000 (1): 40.
[35]
Opinions of the State Council on implementing the reform of the examination and enrollment system of the State Council [EB/OL]. Government Information Disclosure.(2014-09-04)[2017-10-01]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-09/04/content_9065.htm.
[36]
Liu Haifeng. Ideas, principles and policy proposals for the reform of college entrance examination [J]. education research, 2009 (7): 3.
[37]
Hu Zhengyu, Mao Jianping. Difficulties and Prospects for the Reform of the Dual-track College Entrance Examination [J]. Research on Educational Development, 2014 (10): 14.
[38]
Yu Cheng, Queen Xiong. Fair risk analysis of college entrance examination reform [J]. Course, Textbook, Teaching method, 2015 (9): 84.
[39]
Zeng Zhaoxin. The college entrance examination should untie [J]. modern university education on the "Tong" word, 2006 (3): 25.
Browse journals by subject